The acclaimed documentarian has evolved into beyond being a filmmaker; his name is a franchise, an unparalleled production entity. When he has documentary series heading for the television, everyone seeks a part of him.
The filmmaker completed “countless podcast appearances”, he remarks, nearing the end of his marathon promotional journey featuring numerous locations, dozens of preview events and innumerable conversations. “With podcasts numbering in the hundreds of millions, I feel I’ve participated in a substantial portion.”
Thankfully the filmmaker is incredibly dynamic, as loquacious behind the mic as he is accomplished in the editing room. The veteran director has gone everywhere from Monticello to mainstream media outlets to promote one of his most ambitious projects: this historical epic, an extensive six-episode, twelve-hour film project that consumed the past decade of his life and arrived recently on public television.
Like slow cooking amidst instant gratification culture, this documentary series is defiantly traditional, more redolent of The World at War rather than contemporary online content new media formats.
For the documentarian, whose professional life chronicling strands of US history spanning various American subjects, the nation’s founding transcends ordinary historical coverage but foundational. “I recently told collaborator Sarah Botstein recently, and she concurred: no future work will carry greater importance,” Burns contemplates from his New York base.
The filmmaking team along with writer Geoffrey Ward drew upon numerous historical volumes and primary source materials. Dozens of historians, spanning age and perspective, offered expert analysis in conjunction with distinguished researchers representing multiple disciplines such as enslavement studies, first nations scholarship plus colonial history.
The film’s approach will feel familiar to fans of historical documentaries. Its distinctive style incorporated slow pans and zooms over historical images, generous use of period music and actors interpreting primary sources.
This period represented the filmmaker cemented his status; years later, presently the respected veteran of historical films, he can attract virtually any performer. Collaborating with the filmmaker at a recent event, renowned playwright Lin-Manuel Miranda noted: “A call from Ken Burns commands immediate acceptance.”
The lengthy creation process provided advantages regarding scheduling. Sessions happened in studios, in relevant places through digital platforms, a method utilized amid COVID restrictions. Burns explains collaborating with actor Josh Brolin, who found a few free hours in Atlanta to perform his role as George Washington prior to departing to subsequent commitments.
Brolin is joined by numerous acclaimed actors, Jeff Daniels, Morgan Freeman, Paul Giamatti, Domhnall Gleeson, Amanda Gorman, Jonathan Groff, Tom Hanks, Ethan Hawke, Maya Hawke, celebrated film and stage performers, British and American talent, Edward Norton, David Oyelowo, Mandy Patinkin, small and big screen veterans, Dan Stevens, Meryl Streep.
The filmmaker continues: “Honestly, this could represent the finest ensemble gathered for any production. Their contributions are remarkable. Selection wasn’t based on fame. It irritated me when questioned, regarding the famous participants. I responded, ‘These are performers.’ They’re the finest actors in the world and they animate historical material.”
Still, no contemporary observers remain, photography and newsreels required the filmmakers to depend substantially on historical documents, integrating the first-person voices of numerous historical characters. This methodology permitted to present viewers not just the famous founders of that era but also to “dozens of others crucial to understanding, many of whom never even had a portrait painted.
Burns also indulged his particular enthusiasm for maps and spatial representation. “I have great affection for cartography,” he notes, “and there are more maps throughout this series versus earlier productions throughout my entire career.”
The production crew recorded at numerous significant sites throughout the continent and British sites to document environmental context and worked extensively with living history participants. Various aspects converge to present a narrative more bloody, multifaceted and world-changing versus conventional understanding.
The film maintains, was no mere parochial quarrel over land, taxation and representation. Rather, the series depicts a violent confrontation that eventually involved multiple global powers and improbably came to embody described as “the noble aspirations of humankind”.
Early dissatisfaction and objections aimed at the crown by American colonists in 13 fractious colonies quickly evolved into a bloody domestic struggle, setting brother against brother and neighbour against neighbour. During the second installment, the historian Alan Taylor observes: “The primary misunderstanding concerning independence struggle involves believing it represented that unified Americans. This omits the fact that colonists battled fellow colonists.”
In his view, the independence account that “typically is overwhelmed by emotionalism and nostalgia and lacks depth and fails to properly acknowledge actual events, every individual involved and the extensive brutality.
Taylor maintains, a revolution that proclaimed the transformative concept of inherent human rights; a brutal civil war, dividing revolutionaries and royalists; and a global war, continuing previous patterns of conflicts between Britain, France and Spain for the “prize of North America”.
Burns also wanted {to rediscover the
A tech journalist and digital strategist with over a decade of experience covering AI, cybersecurity, and startup ecosystems across Europe.